Author Topic: Biplanes and rigged aircraft  (Read 30289 times)

zak

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6929
  • Grumpy by name and nature
    • View Profile
Re: Biplanes and rigged aircraft
« Reply #120 on: March 23, 2022, 09:52:42 AM »
I have just undercoated the Goshawk.
I started this Pegasus Curtis Sparrowhawk a while ago.
Pegasus biplane kits are very basic, no struts.
I forgot to take a picture of this before the build, but here is one of their Roland Kits, see what you get.The last photo is the Sparrowhawk being worked on.
The struts and arrester hook were scratch built.
They were used from Airships and as the hook was so reliable many had their undercarriage removed.
Grumpy by name and nature

chriswil42

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3118
    • View Profile
Re: Biplanes and rigged aircraft
« Reply #121 on: March 23, 2022, 02:27:25 PM »
That's different.
Chris

zak

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6929
  • Grumpy by name and nature
    • View Profile
Re: Biplanes and rigged aircraft
« Reply #122 on: March 23, 2022, 02:29:08 PM »
I will have to set the Sparrowhawk aside, even after two coats of decal film the transfers still broke up.
I forgot to scan them, I will now need to source some more.
Grumpy by name and nature

cph64

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1528
    • View Profile
Re: Biplanes and rigged aircraft
« Reply #123 on: March 23, 2022, 04:55:33 PM »
Are you building a dirigible to put it under?

zak

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6929
  • Grumpy by name and nature
    • View Profile
Re: Biplanes and rigged aircraft
« Reply #124 on: March 23, 2022, 05:45:26 PM »
Are you building a dirigible to put it under?
I don't think so, but now you have put the idea there?
No, definitely not!
Grumpy by name and nature

Bigkev

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4036
    • View Profile
Re: Biplanes and rigged aircraft
« Reply #125 on: March 23, 2022, 06:10:43 PM »
Are you building a dirigible to put it under?

Hi Chris,
if Zak was to build the two carrier Airships ( Macon and Akron) he would need to buy next door to fit them in.
They were both rigid airships not dirigible.
Perhaps photos of the two airships displayed with the Sparrowhawk is more feasible.
Bigkev
 
I hope my next is always better

zak

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6929
  • Grumpy by name and nature
    • View Profile
Re: Biplanes and rigged aircraft
« Reply #126 on: March 24, 2022, 07:29:33 AM »
Thanks Kevin, useful information.
A bit more detail:
Akron and Macon were designed as airborne aircraft carriers, which could launch and recover heavier-than-air planes for use in both reconnaissance and self-defence.
The ships were equipped with hangars, approximately 75′ long x 60′ wide x 16′ high, which could stow and service up to five aircraft in flight. Aircraft were launched and retrieved by means of a trapeze, and could enter and exit the hangar though a large T-shaped opening at the bottom of the hull.
The capacity to embark and deploy fixed-wing aircraft was the essential element of Akron and Macon’s ability to serve as naval scouts. Airplanes greatly increased the range and area over which the airship could search for the enemy, but also addressed the airship’s own inherent weakness; its vulnerability to attack. The giant airships made large, slow targets which were highly vulnerable to destruction by an enemy’s planes.
Although the Navy originally envisioned the airships as scouting vessels which carried airplanes for fighter defence, over time the Navy eventually realized that the vulnerable airship itself was best employed in the background, out of sight of the enemy; the airship’s function would be to carry scouting planes within range of the enemy. As naval airship doctrine eventually developed, rather than the airplane extending the scouting range of the airship, it was the airship which extended the scouting range of the airplane.
« Last Edit: March 24, 2022, 07:41:43 AM by zak »
Grumpy by name and nature

Bigkev

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4036
    • View Profile
Re: Biplanes and rigged aircraft
« Reply #127 on: March 24, 2022, 07:36:05 PM »
Very interesting Zak.
I knew that they were intended as carriers for the the Sparrow hawk's but not the hangar sizes mentioned. Thanks for the info.
Cheers,
Bigkev
I hope my next is always better

chriswil42

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3118
    • View Profile
Re: Biplanes and rigged aircraft
« Reply #128 on: March 24, 2022, 08:01:43 PM »
Very intersting indeed. I never knew of this use of an airship. Incedible to say the least.
Chris

Haddock

  • Guest
Re: Biplanes and rigged aircraft
« Reply #129 on: March 25, 2022, 06:09:35 AM »
You have to admire the ingenuity of the engineers but even more so, the courage of the aircrew
who were expected to fly these things.
Haddock.

zak

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6929
  • Grumpy by name and nature
    • View Profile
Re: Biplanes and rigged aircraft
« Reply #130 on: March 25, 2022, 01:02:20 PM »
Goshawk just about complete.
Just a couple of bits to paint and then a coat of varnish.
Grumpy by name and nature

chriswil42

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3118
    • View Profile
Re: Biplanes and rigged aircraft
« Reply #131 on: March 25, 2022, 01:46:06 PM »
An excellent model Dave. The backdrop adds to the photos  - must try that.
Chris

zak

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6929
  • Grumpy by name and nature
    • View Profile
Re: Biplanes and rigged aircraft
« Reply #132 on: March 25, 2022, 02:55:24 PM »
An excellent model Dave. The backdrop adds to the photos  - must try that.
I saw what Kevin had done and thought the same.
Grumpy by name and nature

Haddock

  • Guest
Re: Biplanes and rigged aircraft
« Reply #133 on: March 25, 2022, 02:59:47 PM »
Nice!

MSea

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5507
  • I'm sorry Dave I'm afraid I can't do that
    • View Profile
Re: Biplanes and rigged aircraft
« Reply #134 on: March 26, 2022, 09:10:56 AM »
Great idea will steal that - hohohho
MSea