Author Topic: TSESARAVICH, 1904, in1:350.  (Read 24500 times)

Kiteman

  • Guest
Re: TSESARAVICH, 1904, in1:350.
« Reply #30 on: March 03, 2017, 05:30:06 PM »
PPP = PPP ???

Bigkev

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4036
    • View Profile
Re: TSESARAVICH, 1904, in1:350.
« Reply #31 on: March 03, 2017, 07:07:16 PM »
I'll Private Message you Kiteman.
The breakdown of the acronym is........................................?
Cheers,
Bigkev
I hope my next is always better

Kiteman

  • Guest
Re: TSESARAVICH, 1904, in1:350.
« Reply #32 on: March 04, 2017, 05:41:53 PM »
Received and understood....many thanks.

Haddock

  • Guest
Re: TSESARAVICH, 1904, in1:350.
« Reply #33 on: March 06, 2017, 04:27:13 PM »
                       If it's painted, it's stuck in place,
                Next problem is to position the ships boats. Trumpeter's version of events just doesn't make sense.
              They sit on brass cradles..............which don't fit, in such a position that they collide with each other and other stuff too, so a bit of re-engineering is in order, bearing in mind that the funnel stays should land somewhere at deck level, and, with a clear run, no collisions.
Haddock.

MSea

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5507
  • I'm sorry Dave I'm afraid I can't do that
    • View Profile
Re: TSESARAVICH, 1904, in1:350.
« Reply #34 on: March 06, 2017, 10:48:39 PM »
                Next problem is to position the ships boats. Trumpeter's version of events just doesn't make sense.
              They sit on brass cradles..............which don't fit, in such a position that they collide with each other and other stuff too, so a bit of re-engineering is in order, bearing in mind that the funnel stays should land somewhere at deck level, and, with a clear run, no collisions.
Haddock.

The problems we have with ships - all they do is stick a couple of wings onto the body
HoHoHoHo - sorry lads could not miss the opportunity
MSea

Haddock

  • Guest
Re: TSESARAVICH, 1904, in1:350.
« Reply #35 on: March 07, 2017, 07:47:36 AM »
                Next problem is to position the ships boats. Trumpeter's version of events just doesn't make sense.
              They sit on brass cradles..............which don't fit, in such a position that they collide with each other and other stuff too, so a bit of re-engineering is in order, bearing in mind that the funnel stays should land somewhere at deck level, and, with a clear run, no collisions.
Haddock.

The problems we have with ships - all they do is stick a couple of wings onto the body
HoHoHoHo - sorry lads could not miss the opportunity
You have to get 'em the right way up though, the wings that is, not easy sometimes.
Haddock.

« Last Edit: March 07, 2017, 12:56:36 PM by Haddock »

Haddock

  • Guest
Re: TSESARAVICH, 1904, in1:350.
« Reply #36 on: March 07, 2017, 01:26:32 PM »
                  So this is where the after funnel stays will attach to the deck.
            With my dubious eye-sight and hands that shake like a jelly, I have great difficulty attaching the ends of rigging etc by the usual method of superglue and activator , I can never hit the right place first time. However, I do seem to be able to mark and drill holes in the right place, hence the brass tube.
             The line passes through the tube and is fixed somewhere else inside the hull, this lets me attach more than one line in the same place but at different times, ( think about it ).
             Same idea lets you pass through two or even three levels of plastic with the line(s) fixed away from the tube and if you change your mind, you can remove one piece without disturbing the other. Hope that makes sense.
             If you look closely, you should see another "hole" behind the skylight on top of the central deck-house, this is to accept two forestays from the mainmast.
             The tube is 0.6mm O/D X 0.4mm I/D.
           Henceforth, this method shall be known as " the Haddock Hole " or if you prefer it "the 'addock 'ole ".
           At the moment, there are thirteen " 'addock 'oles " dotted around, more could be needed.
Haddock.






zak

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6929
  • Grumpy by name and nature
    • View Profile
Re: TSESARAVICH, 1904, in1:350.
« Reply #37 on: March 07, 2017, 02:16:35 PM »
I do like the term "Addock Ole", seem to fit like a glove Mr Beesting, sir.
Grumpy by name and nature

Kiteman

  • Guest
Re: TSESARAVICH, 1904, in1:350.
« Reply #38 on: March 07, 2017, 03:12:19 PM »
What an ingeneious solution. I am glad that you have shared you "ole" with us.

Roger

  • Guest
Re: TSESARAVICH, 1904, in1:350.
« Reply #39 on: March 07, 2017, 05:39:54 PM »
Perhaps a demonstration of "Addock's Ole" at a club meeting?

Roger

zak

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6929
  • Grumpy by name and nature
    • View Profile
Re: TSESARAVICH, 1904, in1:350.
« Reply #40 on: March 07, 2017, 06:09:39 PM »
Careful now!
Grumpy by name and nature

Bigkev

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4036
    • View Profile
Re: TSESARAVICH, 1904, in1:350.
« Reply #41 on: March 07, 2017, 08:16:15 PM »
I have some spare 3" drainpipe if needed.................................

Sorry, couldn't resist.

Bigkev
I hope my next is always better

Haddock

  • Guest
Re: TSESARAVICH, 1904, in1:350.
« Reply #42 on: March 10, 2017, 04:21:15 PM »
Funnels and bits and bobs added, I think I could be a bit ambitious with the pulleys at the end of the derricks, can't seem to get 'em to hang realistically.
Haddock.

MSea

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5507
  • I'm sorry Dave I'm afraid I can't do that
    • View Profile
Re: TSESARAVICH, 1904, in1:350.
« Reply #43 on: March 10, 2017, 04:27:41 PM »
Is that fishing line you have used on the pulleys ????
MSea

Haddock

  • Guest
Re: TSESARAVICH, 1904, in1:350.
« Reply #44 on: March 10, 2017, 06:14:49 PM »
               Boyes invisible mending thread, it's really the same as fishing line in that it's a nylon monofilament, but cheaper. You get about 300 feet on a reel for £1, that was when I got it some years ago
 0.1mm dia.
Haddock.